RHEA-L Archives

From: <>
Subject: Re: [RHEA-L] 35,000 Tenn. Marr. Records and Bonds
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 03:14:23 EDT

Dorothy,

There was not a listing for your names.
Sorry.
Pat H.


You know in other states. People got their license in one state and married in
another. That's something to think about.

Also Tennessee did not become a state until 1796, so it was still territory
and many counties were formed before they were accepted as counties.They were
some of the first settlements. You also need to look at North Carolina.

This thread:

• Re: [RHEA-L] 35,000 Tenn. Marr. Records and Bonds by <>
  • Re: [RHEA-L] 35,000 Tenn. Marr. Records and Bonds by <>
  • Re: [RHEA-L] 35,000 Tenn. Marr. Records and Bonds by <>

  • Re: [RHEA-L] 35,000 Tenn. Marr. Records and Bonds by <>

  • Re: [RHEA-L] 35,000 Tenn. Marr. Records and Bonds by <>
  • Re: [RHEA-L] 35,000 Tenn. Marr. Records and Bonds by "Linda Spivey Bjorklund" <>
  • Re: [RHEA-L] 35,000 Tenn. Marr. Records and Bonds by <>
  • Re: [RHEA-L] 35,000 Tenn. Marr. Records and Bonds, 1783-1870 by Robert Rhea <>