QUEBEC-L Archives

Archiver > QUEBEC > 2008-12 > 1229645853


From: Louise Hamelin <>
Subject: Re: [QUEBEC] [Q-R] Again where to look in Drouin ??
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:17:33 -0500
References: <CCEOJBBOBIEELIPNIKCNGEBHDPAB.rcummi1123@rogers.com><4BBD2ED73352423A899D9614A38C1D8F@defaulthomeen><494ADA97.9030607@videotron.ca><8FE9673B14EC40458A9BF50CD08D6998@defaulthomeen><494AE0EB.4060101@videotron.ca>


That is the marriage I'm looking for. Since I could not find the records of
1679 for Grondines, I figured those records have to be somewhere in the
area. Thanks.

Louise

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mona Andrée Rainville" <>
To: "Louise Hamelin" <>
Cc: <>; <>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Q-R] Again where to look in Drouin ??


> Hum...
>
> Would you, by any chance, be looking for Louis HAMELIN's marriage in 1679?
> If so, it took place in Grondines, not Deschambault.
>
> Either way, Drouin only starts in 1680 for Grondines...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mona
>
> Louise Hamelin wrote:
>> Salut cousine!
>>
>> Yes, I did try. Portneuf's records start in 1861.
>>
>> Louise
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mona Andrée Rainville"
>> <>
>> To: "Louise Hamelin" <>
>> Cc: <>; <>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 6:19 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Q-R] Again where to look in Drouin ??
>>
>>
>>> Salut la tite cousine,
>>>
>>> Have you tried Portneuf, next door to Deschambault?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Mona
>>>
>>> Louise Hamelin wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to locate a marriage that took place in 1679 in
>>>> Deschambault - Grondines, Co. Portneuf. Where would I look in the
>>>> Drouin for that record??? Records for Grondines only start in 1680 and
>>>> Deschambault in 1713. Please help!
>>>>
>>>> Louise
>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~For the list web page, goto:
>>>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~unclefred/main.htm
>>>> -------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>>>> with the word 'unsubscribe'
>>>> without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

This thread: