QUEBEC-RESEARCH-L Archives

Archiver > QUEBEC-RESEARCH > 2012-01 > 1327712413


From: Fran LaChance <>
Subject: Re: [Q-R] Lucie Majeur - born c 1822
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:00:13 -0500
References: <20d0d.8abff14.3c548a77@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <20d0d.8abff14.3c548a77@aol.com>


There is also an entry at BMS2000 which gives him no last name. I don't see it on the
marriage record. However, a witness for the groom "temoins; Julien Marie Macon. Does
'temoin' mean witness or some kind of guardian, even though he was of age?

Where did you get Lucie's surname from?

Fran



The Future is as Great as the Promises of God

On 27/01/2012 6:17 PM, wrote:
> Looking for the birth of Lucie MAJEUR, daughter of Louis ??? and Josephte
> MORAND.
>
> > From what I read in the parent's marriage record, I have the impression
> that Louis is not accorded a family name in the margin or body of the record.
> The Ancestry index has him as Louis GARCAU, BMS 2000 has him listed as Louis
> MAJOR, with no parents, but I think that record in Vercheres says Louis,
> garcon Majeur.....
>
> Here is what I found so far.
>
> Marriage of Louis ?& Josephte MORAND
>
> https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-267-11849-119837-23?cc=1321742&
> wc=6448763
>
>
> Quebec, Catholic Parish Registers, 1621-1900
> Verchères
> Saint-François-Xavier-de-Verchères
> 1811-1821
> Image 14 of 237 - Right page, M 7
>
> ===================================
> Daughter Lucie's marriage to Luc Desautels
>
> https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-266-11852-114763-77?cc=1321742&
> wc=6440932
>
>
> Quebec, Catholic Parish Registers, 1621-1900
> Saint-Denis
> Saint-Denis-sur-Richelieu
> 1843-1856
> Image 121 of 411
>
> Thanks for any help in finding the birth/baptism of Lucie MAJEUR.
>
> Linnie
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~For the list web page, goto:
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~unclefred/main.htm
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>
>


This thread: