QUEBEC-RESEARCH-L Archives

Archiver > QUEBEC-RESEARCH > 2007-06 > 1182622538


From: Mike Houde <>
Subject: Re: [Q-R] RE : MARRIAGE-ARLINE VARIEUR AND JOSEPH ????????-06 NOV1849 ST. MATHIAS, QUE
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:15:38 -0400
References: <818490.71988.qm@web57005.mail.re3.yahoo.com><005001c7b44c$27a3aa20$43d5af41@yourm5d4u9r2uv><467C7200.6010000@sympatico.ca><FAD90587F7F53049B8DCD504E1A4C4CE4862C0@MAPIUDEM1.sim.umontreal.ca>
In-Reply-To: <FAD90587F7F53049B8DCD504E1A4C4CE4862C0@MAPIUDEM1.sim.umontreal.ca>


Thanks for the clarification.

Desjardins Bertrand wrote:

> An orphan would still have a family name, herited from his father. Not having a family name is linked to not having (legally) a father, that is being «illegitimate».
>
> Bertrand Desjardins Ph.D.
> Chercheur agrégé
> Département de démographie
> Université de Montréal
> C.P. 6128, succ. centre-ville
> Montréal (Qc)
> Canada H3C 3J7
> Tél.: 514-343-7613 Téléc.: 514-343-2309
>
> ________________________________
>
> De: de la part de Mike Houde
> Date: ven. 2007-06-22 21:06
> À:
> Objet : Re: [Q-R] MARRIAGE-ARLINE VARIEUR AND JOSEPH ????????-06 NOV 1849 ST. MATHIAS, QUE
>
>
>
> Hi Jeannette,
>
> I found the marriage you refer to on the online Drouin. Unfortunately,
> there was no last name given for Arline's husband. He is only referred
> to as Joseph, "garcon majeur" rather than "fils majeur" which I believe
> means that he was an orphan.
>
> Can anybody confirm my opinion? I have an example of this for one of my
> ancestors as well.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>> wrote:
>> Seeking name of spouse of ARLINE VARIEUR, daughter of JEAN-BAPTISTE VARIEUR
>> and MARIE-ANGELE MESSIER on 06 Nov 1849 at St. Mathias, Que. Also need
>> parents of Joseph. TIA and God Bless All,
>> Jeannette
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~For the list web page, goto:
> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~unclefred/main.htm
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>
>


This thread: