QUEBEC-RESEARCH-L Archives
Archiver > QUEBEC-RESEARCH > 2005-04 > 1114272439
From: "Diane Lebrun" <>
Subject: Re: [Q-R] Re: Tanguay's book, Souche
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 09:07:19 -0700
References: <77.4411f341.2f9b81ff@aol.com>
Congratulations for describing souche so well.
Diane Lebrun
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 3:48 AM
Subject: [Q-R] Re: Tanguay's book, Souche
> The phrase "'n'ayant pas souche en Canada" means not having roots in
> Canada:
> a souche is the part of the tree underground when a tree is cut,
> therefore,
> these women were not born in Canada.
>
> Marguerite Anthiaume, wife of André Jarret de Beauregard, is listed, and
> she
> is definitely from the parish of St. Nicolas des Champs in Paris, her
> birth
> place, as she declared on her marriage contract and church record. She was
> not
> born in Canada; her "source" or "roots" were not in Canada. She did have
> descendants who survive to this day, including me.
>
> Tanguay also lists known prisoners taken in raids on the English colonies
> who
> later married in New France and became French citizens, including Marie
> Francoise Stevens, taken from New England by the Abenaquis, who cared for
> her for a
> time before she married Jacques Paquet. Her "roots" were not in Canada,
> but
> she has descendants, again including me.
>
> But when Tanguay also lists Marie Mité8ameg8K8é as not being born in
> Canada,
> along with some other female Indians, I have to wonder about his
> definition of
> Canada. Marie's birthplace is unknown, but she was an Algonquinne, and
> probably from an area which is the origin of Charles Pachirini, an
> Algonquin witness
> at her marriage. That area is most likely Allumette Island in the Ottawa
> River. The Algonquins there were called the Kichesipirini, according to
> the DCB.
>
> Tanguay seems to be limiting his definition of "Canada" to the French
> Laurentian colony and working from baptism records he had access to in
> order to
> determine a woman's place of origin. He didn't know that Marie
> Mité8ameg8K8é was
> baptized in Montreal, although she was, admittedly, a married woman at the
> time.
>
> Suzanne
>
> In a message dated 4/21/2005 8:20:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> writes:
> X-Message: #15
> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:33:33 EDT
> From:
> To:
> Message-ID: <>
> Subject: Tanguay's book
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> Good Afternoon :)
>
> I was translating the summary for then end of Tanguay's book...and
> it
> translates as:
>
> pp. 603 to 688 [ Alphabetical table of the names of women not having
> stock
> in Canada; Names of the White married with the indigenous women ]
> What does "not having stock in Canada;" mean?
>
> I might be having a blonde moment but really, I don't know.
>
> Thank you :)
>
> Christine
> Roussell, Masson
>
>
> ==== QUEBEC-RESEARCH Mailing List ====
> Thanks to/Merci a: Diane Szabo, Fr Owen Taggart, Lorie Begin, Andrea Scott
> & Norma Audette for their contribution to uncle's Web page.
> Also submit your homepages, to be linked here...
> Soumets ta page d'accueil pour etre reliee ici...
> See this webpage for list submission criteria..
> Voir la page d'accueil pour les criteres de soumission
> Our Quebec list web page at,/la page Web Quebec a:
> Http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~unclefred/main.htm
>
> ==============================
> Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more.
> Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx
>
This thread:
| Re: [Q-R] Re: Tanguay's book, Souche by "Diane Lebrun" <> |