QUEBEC-RESEARCH-L Archives
Archiver > QUEBEC-RESEARCH > 2002-09 > 1032138691
From: "Albert Dusoe" <>
Subject: Re: [Q-R] explanation
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 21:15:35 -0700
References: <168.13c73af8.2ab66cdc@aol.com>
Thank you, I'll pass on the medium I get confused and I sure do not need
there help..
Again thank you very much
Glenn
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>; <>
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Q-R] explanation
> In a message dated 9/15/02 06:58:51 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> writes:
>
> << have a document that states "the redacteur omitted to sign", did they
> just forgot to sign it or was it for some other reason..
>
>
> Thank You
>
> Glenn
> >>
>
> When a record I have entered in a marriage or baptismal register, it is
> usually because I have simply "omitted to sign".
>
> If you want to know why the signature is omitted from records compiled
> between 1621 and 1799, you would be well advised to consult a medium.
>
> Fr Owen Taggart
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.377 / Virus Database: 211 - Release Date: 7/15/02
This thread:
| Re: [Q-R] explanation by "Albert Dusoe" <> |