ONTARIO-L ArchivesArchiver > ONTARIO > 2000-07 > 0965075801
From: Lotus Young <>
Subject: Re: [ONT] Re: From the Grouch! -- Making Subject Lines Relevant
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 16:36:41 -0400
I am in total agreement that subject lines should be relevant to the
information sought/given. I am also empathetic to a new lister who may not
understand how to do this. For this reason, I'd like to see all of the
experienced listers concentrate on the >relevant< kind of subject line.
This will model what should be included.
I also empathize with those listers who are trying to preserve anonymity.
Somewhere we must find a trust level among listers. I don't have a clue
how that can be done except to always sign my name.
Marilyn & Jack Phelps wrote:
> What we need are larger subject lines and then we wouldn't have to open
> the email....
> Ancestry.com now has more than 200,000 subscribers! To celebrate,
> access to ALL of Ancestry.com will be free from July 18 to July 31!
S C O T T W I T H A M G I L E S D U P E R O H A R T L O V E
J E N K I N S O N P E A S L E Y R U D D O C K M C D O N A L D
B E R T O N S I M P S O N B R O O K S P O W E L L S P E A R
B A R T L E T T S H E G O L D D E S N O Y E R
|Re: [ONT] Re: From the Grouch! -- Making Subject Lines Relevant by Lotus Young <>|