MEX-ZACATECAS-L Archives
Archiver > MEX-ZACATECAS > 2007-05 > 1179440243
From: "" <>
Subject: [MEX-ZACATECAS] Diaz de Leon family in Texas history
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:17:23 -0000
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list.
Author: odiaz180
Surnames:
Classification: queries
Message Board URL:
http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.northam.mexico.zacatecas/1842/mb.ashx
Message Board Post:
DAZ DE LEN, JOS ANTONIO (1786/87-1834). Jos Antonio Daz de Len, the last Franciscan missionary in prerepublic Texas, was born in Mexico either in late 1786 or early 1787. He became a friar in 1811 and was admitted as a cleric in 1812 to the College of Nuestra Seora de Guadalupe de Zacatecas,qv which at the time administered all Franciscan missions in Texas. In 1815, after being ordained to the priesthood, Daz de Len began his missionary career in Nuevo Santander (present Tamaulipas). After being assigned to Texas in 1816 he took charge of Nuestra Seora del Refugio Mission in 1817. In 1818 he conducted a census at Refugio that showed 164 persons, not distinguished in the report by ethnic origin, living at the mission pueblo. This population was, however, soon decimated. In 1820 Daz de Len became resident minister of San Jos y San Miguel de Aguayo Mission in the outskirts of Bexar (San Antonio) and was appointed ad interim president of all the Texas m!
issions. During his tenure at San Jos he took charge of the spiritual care of Indian and Spanish settlers at four partially secularized missions in the neighborhood of San Antonio. He also served briefly as chaplain of the presidio at Goliad and acted as assistant pastor of the church of San Fernando (later San Fernando de Bxar Cathedralqv) during the long absence of its parish priest, Jos Refugio de la Garza,qv who represented the province as a delegate i
Fray Miguel Muro succeeded Daz de Len at Refugio, where fierce Comanche attacks soon brought about the virtual disintegration of the mission. Daz de Len applied to Governor Antonio Mara Martnezqv for military protection for Refugio, or for permission to remove at least the sacred objects to La Baha. After Mexican independence, the new governor, Jos Flix Trespalacios,qv donated fifty pesos to Refugio Mission and promised help, but the desperate situation did not
Unknown to Daz de Len, Father Garza recommended and obtained legislation for the final secularization of the Texas missions in 1823. Daz de Len, as acting president, received the order to transfer the missions but declined to comply without instructions from his superiors in Zacatecas. This was the first in a series of delays and requests for modification of the decree that Daz de Len presented to the government over the next seven years. While seeking exemptions for Espritu Santo and Refugio missions on the basis that the mission Indians still needed protection, the Franciscan had to surrender the San Antonio missions to the Diocese of Monterrey, Nuevo Len, on February 29,
Because of continuing Comanche depredations, Refugio Mission was officially abandoned that summer by order of the political chief, Jos Antonio Saucedo.qv But Daz de Len was determined to save the mission and did not give up. He also became the representative of twelve or thirteen Aranama Indian families who claimed right to the mission lands of Espritu Santo, a move opposed by the ayuntamientoqv of La Baha.qv By that time white colonists, who had been settling the coastal area traditionally considered Indian territory, were causing population displacements in the region. Indians from Refugio Mission, now roaming wild, apparently joined other coastal Indians in harassing the colonists. Armed confrontations ensued. Muro and Daz de Len secured a peace treaty between Stephen F. Austinqv and the Karankawas, but shortly afterwards hostility continued. The Mexican government became convinced that it was wise to support the rehabilitation of Refugio in order to keep th!
e Indians out of trouble. Daz de Len used the opportunity to make a detailed analysis of the Indian situation in the area and listed the specific needs of Refugio Mission under such conditions. In 1825, while considering a request from the people of Nacogdoches to become their pastor, the missionary moved to Espritu Santo. He did not wait for government help but set out with Muro to the wilderness in order to gather scattered mission Indians. Refugio was reestablished, and Muro resumed his ministry there, though without much
In 1826 Zacatecas officially named Daz de Len president of the Texas missions. The college also granted his request to trade a mission bell to the new town of Victoria for items useful to the Indians under his care at Espritu Santo. The Franciscan-described by a contemporary French observer as "an industrious, disinterested man, adored by the indigenes"-continued against all odds, by pastoral visitations, to serve the spiritual needs of the whole region for three more years. The question of how to distribute the mission lands turned more complicated because settlers and empresarios coveted them. The town of Goliad (as La Baha was renamed in 1829) obtained from the state government a new decree to enforce secularization of the missions on March 6, 1829. Daz de Len, upon receiving the order, went to San Antonio to argue once more for delays, conceding Espritu Santo but requesting exemption at least for Refugio. Having finally lost the case of the Aranama families!
a few months before, he knew that secularization would result in depriving mission Indians of their land. He gathered a number of Aranamas, as well as some Karankawas and Cocos, and took them to El Oso, ten miles below Goliad on the San Antonio River. He tried to encourage them to farm in common there and live according to a modified mission routine. He took whatever he could from Espritu Santo and gave it to them. But because the town protested the presence of the Indians in their neighborhood the experiment had to end. The Franciscan finally decided to comply with the secularization decree. He made an inventory and then, on February 8, 1830, surrendered the last remaining missions. The mission lands, as he had expected, were soon made available to colo
Under the jurisdiction of the see of Nuevo Len the friar was assigned a parish post in Nacogdoches. The College of Zacatecas received an anonymous letter written in Latin by a Catholic empresarioqv in Texas warning the superiors not to let missionaries move to Anglo settlements beyond the Colorado River because of danger to them. Daz de Len, refusing to believe the warning and showing no fear, accepted the risk and went to Nacogdoches. There he found the church being used as a barracks by the troops of Col. Jos de las Piedras,qv who had quartered them there since the Fredonian Rebellionqv of 1827. The friar rented a house as a temporary chapel but was eventually evicted when he could not pay. He organized a "piety board" (junta de piedad) intended to solicit private donations for the construction of a new church and school. Eager to help in civic activities, he became a member of the town's health board, established to combat smallpox. He also began signing the offic!
ial reports of all births, baptisms, marriages, and deaths. Using Nacogdoches as home base, he undertook pastoral visitations throughout the whole district. He approached Indian, Hispanic, and Anglo alike. His English, however, was very poor, and he had little success with most Anglo colonists, who were willing to be only nominal Catholics in order to comply with the Mexican colonization law. The Anglos would have preferred someone like English-speaking Father Michael Muldoon,qv who had been performing token Catholic marriages in the Austin colony, thus producing scores of the nominal Catholics who came to be called "Muldoon Catholics." It was difficult to discern at the time who among the colonists was Catholic by conviction. A case in point is Sam Houston,qv baptized by Daz de Len at the house of Adolphus Sterne,qv a common friend, in 1
The Anglo-Hispanic polarity was reaching a dangerous level of tension in East Texas by 1834. Stephen F. Austin, who had been privately writing bitter condemnations of the Catholic Church in general and missionary friars in particular, was being held in jail without trial in Mexico, to the dismay of the colonists. After the Mexican government passed a national law of religious toleration that suddenly released Protestant colonists from their pretensions to Catholicism, the presence of Daz de Len, a pious and dedicated Mexican missionary, came to be resented in Nacogdoches. He received several death threats and learned that someone had been paid to assassinate him. After performing a marriage ceremony near Liberty (Liberty County), he wrote a moving farewell letter to friends and enemies, knowing that his end was near. On November 4, 1834, he was shot on his way back to Nacogdoches, in the vicinity of St. Augustine. At the moment of death he was kneeling, as if in prayer. !
He was the thirty-first, and last, Zacatecan missionary to die in Texas. Some Mexicans living in the area, convinced that Daz de Len and five other citizens had been murdered, sent a report to Gen. Martn Perfecto de Cos,qv who allocated 300 soldiers under Col. Domingo de Ugartecheaqv to impose order in the Eastern District. Meanwhile, the official investigation of the Franciscan's death dragged for a few months until an inquiry concluded that the missionary had grown so frightened of being killed that he killed himself. Catholic historians regard this judgment as a calumny against a priest-martyr, whereas Protestant ones favor a verdict of suicide. It would at least have been impolitic for a court of inquiry staffed by colonists to return a verdict of murder. In 1926 a German, Robert Streit, published a historical novel on Daz de Len, Der letzte Franziskaner von Texas; the work remains untranslated. See also FRANCISCANS, CATHOLIC CHURCH, CATHOLIC DIOCESAN CHURCH O!
F SPANISH AND MEXICAN T
BIBLIOGRAPHY: Jean Louis Berlandier, Journey to Mexico during the Years 1826 to 1834 (Austin: Texas State Historical Association, 1980). Bexar Archives, Barker Texas History Center, University of Texas at Austin. Carlos E. Castaeda, Our Catholic Heritage in Texas (7 vols., Austin: Von Boeckmann-Jones, 1936-58; rpt., New York: Arno, 1976). Catholic Archives of Texas, Files, Austin. Marion A. Habig, "Mission San Jos y San Miguel de Aguayo," Southwestern Historical Quarterly 71 (April 1968). William H. Oberste, History of Refugio Mission (Refugio, Texas: Refugio Timely Remarks, 1942). William H. Oberste, Our Lady Comes to Refugio (Corpus Christi: Jones, 1944). Antonio Lpez de Santa Anna et al., The Mexican Side of the Texan Revolution, trans. Carlos E. Castaeda (Dallas: Turner, 1928; 2d ed., Austin: Graphic Ideas, 1970). David J. Weber, The Mexican Frontier, 1821-1846 (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1982
Anbal A. Gonzlez
Important Note:
The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
This thread: