LIST-UPDATE-L Archives

Archiver > LIST-UPDATE > 2006-08 > 1155431574


From:
Subject: Re: [LIST-UPDATE] Just so nobody can claim having had nocomplaints...
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 21:12:54 -0400
References: <44DE3C2C.6030702@yahoo.com><d49706560608121544w7ebbe3ffy68420e1f8da940a0@mail.gmail.com><44DE5F90.4080403@yahoo.com><d49706560608121621xd952f2eu1a2be888d6c966a7@mail.gmail.com><d49706560608121626o6d1738efq9cfae3ad5b75d8a0@mail.gmail.com><95b5b6b90608121643vdd8c8b1o7634be61a1e3e956@mail.gmail.com><520b3e20608121732q786a39a0ha9e7f244dde53fca@mail.gmail.com><bce5c49d0608121743u360b3dbcp407e1d03b9cc1362@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bce5c49d0608121743u360b3dbcp407e1d03b9cc1362@mail.gmail.com>


Please, don't lecture me about procedure. I am aware of NO program,
that after having gone through even very extensive, intensive beta
testing, launches with absolutely NO glitches.

I STILL say that the timing for this 'transition' .... is .... (how
can I say this politely?) .... NOT in the best interest of MANY
genealogists! AND, if Ancestry tries to brag about their actions at
the FGS... I'll be SURE to let them know my opinion of their latest
'stunt'. In plain English, as the kids say, their timing
's.u.c.k.s'!.


On 8/12/06, Joan Asche <> wrote:
> It's my understanding that the BETA testing is over (I could be wrong
> about this) because a number of lists and their admins worked as BETA
> testers to smooth the process over for the rest of us.
>
> There will a period of adjustment -- life have lots of them -- we
> manage to survive them and I'm sure this one will be no different.
>
> J. Asche


This thread: