GENMSC-L Archives

Archiver > GENMSC > 2001-03 > 0985714711


From: Singhals <>
Subject: Re: "Immigrant" a dirty word?
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:38:31 -0800
References: <in8ubt8ea0qdcpgnefl43ksecnc2tfdv3i@4ax.com>, <3ABF6F75.478DC745@erols.com>, <99p2mv$8pc$1@diamond.ewlab.usna.edu>


PROF A. R. Whitaker {FEC FAC} wrote:
>
> In article <>, Singhals <> wrote:
> >
> >Using Arthur's sliding scale, you've got Emigres (who generally
> >had money and left home through no real choice of their own),
> >Immigrants (who generally didn't and did), and migrants (who
> >didn't and didn't). I think all mine were migrants. (g)
> >
> >Cheryl
>
> Great - I love it! <G> Now . . . how does "transported to the
> colonies" fit into your paradign?
> A. Royall Whitaker, Gent.
> Often in erorr, never in doubt


No money, no choice -- guess they'd be migrants? (g)

And yes, one day, in the fullness of time, I hope to remember
that not all A Whitacres are named Arthur. (g) Sorry.

Cheryl

This thread: