GENBRIT-L Archives
Archiver > GENBRIT > 2002-01 > 1011396484
From: "s-athomas" <>
Subject: Re: Puzzled
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:28:04 -0000
References: <a29vhh$vtf9t$1@ID-16587.news.dfncis.de>
Also I suspect sometimes officials were rather brusque -- it is quite
possible that the registrar said: "What's your name? " and filled it in then
thrust the book across the table and said: "Put your mark there." I doubt
if many women would stop him, and demand to be allowed to sign their own
name...
People were probably more indulgent at the time of a marriage.
Sally-Anne
I use www.archivecdbooks.com
Old books for genealogists reproduced on CD
"Tim" <> wrote in message
news:a29vhh$vtf9t$1@ID-16587.news.dfncis.de...
> When one receives a certificate from a registrar of birth,marriage,and
> deaths are the details always written exactly as shown on original?I know
> that you might be thinking why is he asking such a dumb question but i am
> somewhat puzzled by the following.
>
> On the marriage cert of my 2gt grandmother in the part that says this
> marriage was solemnized between us it gives James Matthews and Fanny
Dunn.I
> presume that the parties concerned had to fill this and if either had not
> been able to sign there would have been an x the mark of blah blah
>
> However the birth cert of my gt grandmother Fanny Matthews indicates that
> the informant Fanny Matthews could not write
> as it gives x the mark of Fanny Matthews.The address given for the
> informant is the same address at which the birth took
> place so i have always assumed that the informant was Fanny Matthews nee
> Dunn especially as i am not aware of any of my female Matthews having the
> first name Fanny.However if that is the case why could she write when she
> was married in 1855
> but could not write when my gt grandmother was born in 1863.
> I have never been able to fathom it out .Would welcome some thoughts.
>
> Thank you
>
> Tim
>
>
This thread:
| Re: Puzzled by "s-athomas" <> |