GENBOX-L Archives
Archiver > GENBOX > 2004-02 > 1077132986
From: "Phil O'Phax" <>
Subject: Re: [GENBOX] Enough Author Types?
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:36:26 +0000
References: <FFEBLNNBNENFDKOPJEBPEEEFEJAA.paulharris@nc.rr.com><403394D2.5050304@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <403394D2.5050304@comcast.net>
Did you mean the other way round?
Don,
I would have thought the Maloney's were the potato diggers (avoiding the
Irish Potato Famines of course)
Schmidt is German for Smith, is it not?
Phil.
At 16:37 18/02/2004, Don Zochert wrote:
>Paul J. Harris wrote:
>
>>While "Schmidt to Maloney, 23 January 1924" in a secondary
>>reference may be good enough for you, I can't tolerate it. I
>>happen to be in possession of over 800 letters written by my
>>Harris and Lambert relatives, often to each other.
>
>Then obviously you need more detailed identification in a second
>reference. My Schmidts and Maloneys were too busy digging potatoes and
>hauling baggage to write 800 letters to each other. Still, adding more
>source template codes and increasing user options in citation design might
>serve the needs of both those with high standards and those without.
>
>Don
Member of Kent FHS, NW Kent FHS, DEVFHS,SoG,GOONS,Chairman of the Warnies
Ancestral Group (WAG)
I use and recommend CD's from ACDB for my One Name Study research
http://www.archivecdbooks.org/
This thread:
| Re: [GENBOX] Enough Author Types? by "Phil O'Phax" <> |