ESSEX-UK-L Archives

Archiver > ESSEX-UK > 2011-12 > 1323603740

From: "Alan Nelson" <>
Subject: Re: [Ess] 1911 census
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 11:54:51 -0000
References: <0C1A90C0338548269FD5E3200F15B3DD@DavidPC><001c01ccb76a$a225e2b0$4101a8c0@YOUR60C1573C39><45E6C652628449C8A8910E349EDFC68A@AirtechPC><>

If it is a item you cannot change I add something in comments box especially
if spouse cannot be traced usually because crossmatching reference is wrong
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Ess] 1911 census

> Hi Keith,
> The rational they give for not changing names, but rather adding an
> alternative, is so that those who have found someone with the erroneous
> transcription won't lose them again.
> Sounds like rubbish to me, but that is what they say.
> I to always add my own corrections where possible, having done my first
> for the 1911 census yesterday. My great granda was not born in Ludlow
> Staffs, but Lucknow Staffs. (This is for a Northumberland entry)
> Cheers
> Steve
> On 11/12/2011 03:29, ListMail wrote:
>> One would have to wonder how Ancestry can take the databases from FreeBMD
>> and change the spelling of a registration district. Rather sloppy work.
>> The
>> FreeBMD entry for on Ancestry Holbron I checked reads as Holborn.
>> I have long since given up trying to get Ancestry to change transcription
>> errors as they appear not to be interested in doing so. Where I can I add
>> my
>> interpretation to entries I consider wrong to assist others.
>> Keith Wellington
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Any problems, please contact the List Admin:
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This thread: