ESSEX-UK-L Archives

Archiver > ESSEX-UK > 2011-04 > 1302780037


From: "JFHH" <>
Subject: Re: [Ess] PITTUCK
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:20:37 +0100
References: <8CAD4632D20349118495470FC252397A@KimPC>


Hi Kim,
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kim Jones" <>
> If anyone comes across the surname PITTUCK, PITTICK or PITTOCK before 1800 I would be very
> interested in hearing from them. My main line come from Wivenhoe but my last record is a John
> PITTUCK married to Catherine BRIMER (I think that's the name, handwriting not to good) in 1784,
> then John's second marriage to Mary WILLIAMS in 1785. The marriage records say he was 'of this
> parish' but there is no recording of any PITTUCK / ICK / OCK before John's first marriage.
> > Happy hunting all,> Kim.> > Kim Jones (nee Pittuck)> NSW Australia.

You might also consider PUTTOCK. which is a name I have come across in modern times.
Regards,
John Henley



This thread: