ESSEX-UK-L Archives

Archiver > ESSEX-UK > 2007-10 > 1191768141


From: Tony Pottrell <>
Subject: Re: [Ess] Brothers/Cousins
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:45:28 +0100
References: <47064230.9080007@pyroport.com><007101c80801$b93050c0$3f761ad3@GENHILLIER>
In-Reply-To: <007101c80801$b93050c0$3f761ad3@GENHILLIER>


Thanks to all the replies guys - most helpful. From them I can place
Richard (the leaver of the Will) into my tree, and I now know that he
must have had some siblings that were not christened (or at least not
christened in Chrishall for which I have the parish registers extracts for).

T

pamhillier wrote:
> Tony most of this has been answered but have you checked the surrounding
> Parish registers. If they moved around for work for example they may be
> baptised in a nearby villlage/town, happened to me many times. Also I had a
> family that lived between two towns. Most children were baptised in one
> Parish but it seems on Market day if they went into the 'other town" a
> market town, they baptised there as well. This and the miscarriages and
> still births that have been previously mentioned of course could account for
> missing baptisms.
> Cheers Pam from Adelaide Australia
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just wondering if someone can help me clarify the legal definition of
>> brother and cousin in/around 1700?
>>
>>
>>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Any problems, please contact the List Admin:
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>
>

This thread: