ESSEX-UK-L Archives

Archiver > ESSEX-UK > 2007-09 > 1188808777


From: "Andy Hedgcock" <>
Subject: Re: [Ess] George INGRAM 1871 Barking, Essex
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 09:39:37 +0100
References: <002601c7ed97$03db5960$0201a8c0@woodward910ae4><008901c7eddb$eaab3ce0$0201010a@pamzmocwe33zpr>


Hi Suzie
You shouldn't take it as being the mother's surname without actual proof.
I've got FLAVEL as a middle name but that was not the mother's maiden name,
and there are not as far as I can tell any FLAVELs in the blood line.. Plus
the fact that both father and son had it as a middle name.

You should get the birth cert of at least one of the children to be certain.
Or the marriage certificate. Are you having problems tracking information on
either of these?

Cheers
Andy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pam Dale" <>
To: "Suzie Woodward" <>; "Essex List"
<>
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Ess] George INGRAM 1871 Barking, Essex


> HI Suzie
>
> It definitely looks like Rool Look at the family below whose father is
> Robert. Looking at the
> occup of Arthur Ingram, Bldr, the l looks the same. It is a stange name
> but perhaps you are right
> it is the mother's maiden name.
>
> Regards
> Pam in Brisbane Australia
> Looking for COOPER in Barking
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Suzie Woodward" <>
> To: "Essex List" <>
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 5:25 AM
> Subject: [Ess] George INGRAM 1871 Barking, Essex
>
>
> Would someone be able to look at the following sheet of the 1871 and tell
> me
> what they think the second name is of the child George INGRAM.
>
> Is it TOOL or ROOT or ????
>
> Am really trying to find the surname of the mother and wonder if this
> might
> be a clue.
> RG10 / 1647 / 45 / 9
>
> That would be really appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Suzie (from Orkney)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Any problems, please contact the List Admin:
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>
>



This thread: