ESSEX-UK-L Archives

From: "Jenny De Angelis" <>
Subject: Re: [Ess] 1837online,Ancestry,the PRO and the 1861 census index.
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:09:29 +0200
References: <83.247ca0fe.2f7be229@aol.com>

HI Dave,

Sorry it was my mistake, I misunderstood your meaning about the 1861
transcribing and who was responsible for it. It does seem odd though that
this indexing is on a par with the 1901 indexing.

Regards
Jenny DeAngelis.
Spain.

>
> There has been no suggestion that Qinetiq were involved with indexing the
> 1861 census; the only comment was an ironic one by me.
>
> 1837online have gone the same route for the same reasons - and apparently
> with the same results. In the words of the protest song in the 1960s,
> 'When will
> they ever learn?'

This thread:

• Re: [Ess] ESFH census indexes by
  • Re: [Ess] ESFH census indexes by Ruth Aylett <>
    • Re: [Ess] ESFH census indexes by "J. Buck" <>
    • 1837online,Ancestry,the PRO and the 1861 census index. by "Jenny De Angelis" <>
      • Re: [Ess] 1837online,Ancestry,the PRO and the 1861 census index. by

        • Re: [Ess] 1837online,Ancestry,the PRO and the 1861 census index. by "Jenny De Angelis" <>

  • ESFH census indexes by "John Mead" <>