ESSEX-UK-L Archives

Archiver > ESSEX-UK > 2002-03 > 1017363683


From: "jayne perry" <>
Subject: Re: Genealogists OUR RIGHTS
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:01:23 +1200
References: <002101c1d667$7157a770$3e597ad5@iang9nhzs76q6b>


Hi Ian,
Can I please forward some of your emails to other lists. Your sense of
humour is delightful!
By the way, who is the dashing young blade from Essex?!!!!!!
Have a great Easter,
Jayne

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Hunter" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 2:47 AM
Subject: Genealogists OUR RIGHTS


> Right on Jeannette,
>
> How many people would the PRO have to sue if they sued everyone who
> shared? Karen would be in a right pickle :O) What about that dashing
> young blade who does Essex Pubs? The people who help the Free BMD?
> People who have their Family Tree on the 'net?
>
> Better not put ideas in QthingQ's half a brain cell.
>
> Nah! As far as I'm aware it's "public domain" material.
>
> POWER TO THE PEOPLE!
>
> Cheers
>
> Ian Pubby Hunter
>
> Essex Pubs at: http://www.essexpubs.net
>
> I use Archive CD Books to help with my research
> http://www.archivecdbooks.org
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: JEANETTE SHERMER [mailto:]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:38 AM
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: 1901 census transcription OUR RIGHTS
> >
> >
> > I think you will find that all the information on the 1901
> > census is "Public
> > Information / Knowledge" and the PRO cant charge for us to
> > look at it, If
> > you look at it on the web then the PRO can charge for the
> > work they have done putting it on the web. If we go to a
> > Public Record office and look it up then there is no charge
> > and there by the 1901 census is Not Copy Rght. so if we
> > read some of it and then we choose to 'SHARE OUR INFORMATION'
> > then what can anyone do about that. Its Public Information. Jeanette
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 14/03/2002
>
>
>


This thread: