ESSEX-UK-L Archives
Archiver > ESSEX-UK > 1998-05 > 0895857483
From: RCsatex <>
Subject: Fwd: Replies
Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 13:18:03 EDT
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--part0_895857483_boundary
Content-ID: <>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
In a message dated 98-05-22 09:10:06 EDT, writes:
<<
To: >>
Hello All....
If a query was posted on a mailing list, it should be answered on the same
list....that is how we learn from others on the list. I can just see a list
full of queries - but no replies....does that make sense?
Bob Curtis from San Antonio, Tx
--part0_895857483_boundary
Content-ID: <>
Content-type: message/rfc822
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
Return-Path: <>
Received: from rly-za05.mx.aol.com (rly-za05.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.101]) by
air-za05.mail.aol.com (v43.17) with SMTP; Fri, 22 May 1998 09:10:06
-0400
Received: from fp-1.rootsweb.com (fp-1.rootsweb.com [207.113.233.233])
by rly-za05.mx.aol.com (8.8.5/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0)
with ESMTP id JAA28464;
Fri, 22 May 1998 09:09:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from )
by fp-1.rootsweb.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA15520;
Fri, 22 May 1998 05:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 05:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:
Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 07:07:10 -0600 (MDT)
Old-To: Howard M Knight <>
Old-cc:
Subject: Re: Replies
In-Reply-To: <>
Message-ID:
<>
Resent-Message-ID: <"CChQnD.A.hwD.TSXZ1"@fp-1.rootsweb.com>
To:
Resent-From:
X-Mailing-List: <> archive/latest/1411
X-Loop:
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Hello Howard and all,
I'm afraid I disagree. Many times the answer to someone's question had
given me valuable information that I didn't even know I needed.
It has given me new ideas on where to look for information and provided
addresses and URLs for places and websites that I didn't know existed.
I often read someone's questions and wait to see the answer come along.
When it's replied to privately I am denied a new avenue of research.
Please everyone keep sending answers to the list unless it's absolutely of
no benefit to others.
It's sort of like tearing the pages out of a medical book that deal with
cancer because you don't have it - yet.
Read and delete if it doesn't help you.
Thanks for letting me get my two cents worth in.
Best wishes and good hunting
Madeline
Perpetually in search of family tree:
AVIS - Suffolk> London
ROSEBLADE - Gloucester>Middlesex> London
WELHAM - Kent> Suffolk
LANGTHORN - Middlesex
---------------------------------*
---------------------------------*
Supporting the campaign for cheaper and easier access to old civil
registration records.
On Fri, 22 May 1998, Howard M Knight wrote:
> Hallo everybody,
>
> Would it be too much to ask that any reply intended for an individual
> member of the list should be sent to the individual in question and NOT to
> the whole list?
>
> It would leave the rest of the members with more time to devote to the
> other messages which might be relevant to them.
>
> Howard.
>
> Howard Marriage Knight, near Bristol, UK
> (Marriage One-Name Study - Guild of One-Name Studies member no. 1750)
>
--part0_895857483_boundary--
This thread:
| Fwd: Replies by RCsatex <> |