ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM-L Archives

From: "Siebert" <>
Subject: [B'ham] Richard and Mary Yates -- 1901 census
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 06:32:01 +1200
In-Reply-To: <000001c3520d$40f3fc50$6401a8c0@CanadianDolphin>

Morning Andrew,

First you hover over the yellow paying envelope and read the number across
the bottom bar, in this case 92956289. Anyone else on the same census page
will have the same numbers.

Then you search for any Yates in the same place (Aston Manor) and hover over
each yellow envelope until you have a match with yours and eliminate the
others.

In this case:

Albert Yates 17 Aston Birmingham Warwick Aston Manor General Labourer
Gertrude Yates 15 Aston Birmingham Warwick Aston Manor Gauger
Harry Yates 13 Aston Birmingham Warwick Aston Manor Errand Boy For Metal
Polish
Mary Yates 36 Smethwick Birmingham Warwick Aston Manor
Philip Yates 9 Aston Birmingham Warwick Aston Manor
Richard Yates 44 Aston Birmingham Warwick Aston Manor General Labourer
Wallace Yates 5 Aston Birmingham Warwick Aston Manor

I just had a quick look through, so there may be someone else. And of course
it doesn't find people in the house with different names eg mother-in-law.

Good hunting,

Bernadette
in NZ

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Smith [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, 25 July 2003 05:59
To:
Subject: [B'ham] Richard and Mary Yates -- 1901 census


Hello out there,
On the 1901 census search, I find the following person of interest:

Richard Yates 44 Aston Birmingham Warwick Aston Manor General Labourer

Would anyone be able to help me determine which people are of his
family? (on the same page as him)? Would appreciate any help.

Andrew.


==== ENG-WARKS-BIRMINGHAM Mailing List ====
Uh-Oh!!! <----- Missed or deleted a post that might put a crack in
your wall? Remember, day & night, the RootsWeb Archives are always there to
browse or search. Go to: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/ .

==============================
To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go
to:
http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237

This thread:

• [B'ham] Re: Cunningham by <>