DNA-R1B1C7-L Archives

Archiver > DNA-R1B1C7 > 2012-05 > 1336401577


From: Susan Hedeen <>
Subject: Re: [R-M222] [RL21Project] Re: New DF23 result
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 10:41:55 -0400
References: <96773717-44FC-4C55-81F5-14AE89FA33AA@comcast.net> <4FA7BA98.7030209@earthlink.net><4FA7CDCC.2070307@earthlink.net><000301cd2c5b$a311a0e0$e934e2a0$@com><4FA7DB48.1070606@earthlink.net><000701cd2c5d$5e37fa80$1aa7ef80$@com>
In-Reply-To: <000701cd2c5d$5e37fa80$1aa7ef80$@com>


What are the kit numbers? From the table you linked I counted DF23+ &
M222-; I also counted DF23- and M222-. I did not see 13 DF23+
M222+...please correct me if I misread, but I went through the list
twice. Susan

On 5/7/2012 10:26 AM, Sandy Paterson wrote:
> 13 M222+ have tested DF23+. No M222+ has tested DF23-.
>
> Sandy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Susan Hedeen [mailto:]
> Sent: 07 May 2012 15:25
> To: Sandy Paterson
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [R-M222] [RL21Project] Re: New DF23 result
>
> Are you saying 13 have tested DF23+ M222- or 13 M222+ have also tested
> DF23+? I'd be curious to know how many M222+ have tested for DF23 since
> it has become available for testing. Susan
>
>
>
>


This thread: