**DNA-R1B1C7-L Archives**

From:"Sandy Paterson" <>Subject:Re: [R-M222] analysisDate:Fri, 6 Jan 2012 17:54:24 -0000References:<5ab7.327af185.3c365f07@aol.com>, ,<SNT128-W6485989739F5F4A04CE66EBB940@phx.gbl>, ,<000001cccb7f$007a4540$016ecfc0$@com>,<SNT128-W65685B15B0EECB820BB181BB940@phx.gbl>,<000001cccc72$601b4640$2051d2c0$@com><SNT128-W31B47488651E68332695E4BB950@phx.gbl>In-Reply-To:<SNT128-W31B47488651E68332695E4BB950@phx.gbl>I may have read it, but if so, it was about three years ago. I do remember

him writing about first-order kinetics.

[He refers to a logarithmic approach where transition of the base haplotypes

into mutated ones is described by first-order kinetics ln(B/A)=kt, which is

a Poisson distribution.]

The Poisson distribution is a distribution of frequencies. I may be missing

something, but what is it about ln(B/A) = kt that leads you to the

conclusion that it is a distribution? Can it be turned into a distribution

perhaps?

Sandy

-----Original Message-----

From:

[mailto:] On Behalf Of Bernard Morgan

Sent: 06 January 2012 17:02

To: dna-r1b1c7

Subject: Re: [R-M222] analysis

> ln(257/89)/.022 = 48.2

> ln(257/18)/.046 = 57.8

>

> and concludes that the two answers are within his error margin, so he's

> happy to proceed.

>

> Exactly what this has to do with a Poisson distribution is a mystery to

me,

Have you read his other paper "DNA Genealogy, Mutation Rate, and Some

Historical Evidence Written in the Y-Chromosome: I. Basic Principles and the

Method'?

http://www.jogg.info/52/files/Klyosov1.pdf

He refers to a logarithmic approach where transition of the base haplotypes

into mutated ones is described by first-order kinetics ln(B/A)=kt, which is

a Poisson distribution.

R1b1c7 Research and Links:

http://clanmaclochlainn.com/R1b1c7/

-------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to

with the word 'unsubscribe' without the

quotes in the subject and the body of the message

**This thread:**

- [R-M222] Analysis by Susan Hedeen <>
- [R-M222] analysis by Susan Hedeen <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by
- Re: [R-M222] analysis by "Sandy Paterson" <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by Bernard Morgan <>

- [R-M222] analysis by Susan Hedeen <>

- [R-M222] analysis by Susan Hedeen <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by
- Re: [R-M222] analysis by Bernard Morgan <>
- Re: [R-M222] analysis by "Sandy Paterson" <>
- Re: [R-M222] analysis by Bernard Morgan <>
- Re: [R-M222] analysis by "Sandy Paterson" <>
- Re: [R-M222] analysis by Bernard Morgan <>
**Re: [R-M222] analysis by "Sandy Paterson" <>**- Re: [R-M222] analysis by Bernard Morgan <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by Bernard Morgan <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by "Sandy Paterson" <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by Bernard Morgan <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by "Sandy Paterson" <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by "Sandy Paterson" <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by Bernard Morgan <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by
- Re: [R-M222] analysis by "Sandy Paterson" <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by
- Re: [R-M222] analysis by Iain Kennedy <>

- Re: [R-M222] analysis by "Sandy Paterson" <>