DNA-R1B1C7-L Archives

From:
Subject: [R-M222] R-M222 with 390=24
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:29:15 +0000 (UTC)

Colin,

   You said you attribute the 24 and 25 values for 390 in your family to a recent mutation. I know 390 is a slow mutator, and I have a list around somewhere showing average mutation rates, but I can't find it. No matter, I have found so few 24s for that marker among the other M222 that I must conclude the same has happened in our Byrne Northwest Cluster. Apparently, 390=24 is a divider within family lines and not a broader one.

   You mentioned Ferguson roots in Cavan, Mayo, and Leitrim. Is their an Irish Ferguson origin separate from a Scotland one, or do they all trace back to the latter?

    Thanks for your input.

Paul

This thread:

• [R-M222] R-M222 with 390=24 by

  • [R-M222] Common markers in M222 by John Mclaughlin <>
    • [R-M222] Common Markers in M222 by
      • Re: [R-M222] Common Markers in M222 by Mitch <>
        • Re: [R-M222] Common Markers in M222 by John Mclaughlin <>
          • Re: [R-M222] Common Markers in M222 by Mitch <>
      • Re: [R-M222] Common Markers in M222 by John Mclaughlin <>
        • Re: [R-M222] Common Markers in M222 by "Paul Conroy" <>
          • Re: [R-M222] Common Markers in M222 by "Sandy Paterson" <>
    • Re: [R-M222] Common Markers in M222 by "VON HAMRICK" <>
    • Re: [R-M222] Common markers in M222 by "David Ewing" <>
      • Re: [R-M222] Common markers in M222 by "Sandy Paterson" <>
    • Re: [R-M222] Common markers in M222 by "David Ewing" <>
      • Re: [R-M222] Common markers in M222 by John Mclaughlin <>
      • Re: [R-M222] Common markers in M222 by "Sandy Paterson" <>
  • Re: [R-M222] R-M222 with 390=24 by "Colin Ferguson" <>