DNA-R1B1C7-L Archives
Archiver > DNA-R1B1C7 > 2008-10 > 1223359839
From: "Sandy Paterson" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Questions ???
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:10:39 +0100
References: <c24.4924e83d.361bee57@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <c24.4924e83d.361bee57@aol.com>
Hi John
Thanks.
Your thoughts on the following would be interesting, notwithstanding your
answer :
If you look at the O Cathains at the O'Kane site, you'll see that 13 for
DYS439 is very common, in fact you could call it modal. If you then look at
Ewings, you find the same thing.
Did the rise to prominence of the O'Kanes pre- or post-date the hypothetical
spawning of Anradans?
I'll see what I can find for Scots McNeils and McLaughlins at DYS439.
Sandy
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of
Sent: 06 October 2008 23:43
To:
Subject: Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Questions ???
Not really. If it was going to match any Ui Neill R1b1c7 the closest
possibility are the MacLochlainns of Donegal. The O'Kanes are further down
the
tree by several centuries. But that just underscores the point I was
trying to
make. We don't see any markers that tie the McLaughlins and O'Kanes
together
as related except for the R1b1c7 haplogroup. That's what everyone is
looking for and no one's found anything yet. Maybe you can.
John
In a message dated 10/6/2008 11:46:36 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
writes:
Would you agree then that the DNA of Anradan-associated surnames should
look
similar to
O Cathain DNA?
**************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination.
Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out!
(http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000001)
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message
This thread:
| Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Questions ??? by "Sandy Paterson" <> |