DNA-R1B1C7-L Archives

Archiver > DNA-R1B1C7 > 2008-10 > 1222980172


From: "Paul Conroy" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Questions ???
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 16:42:52 -0400
References: <cbe.2697794a.36168720@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <cbe.2697794a.36168720@aol.com>


John,
We do know what the O'Neill DNA really is, I posted an email on 09/20/07 to
this list which conclusively explained everything from both a historic and
genetic viewpoint - which you yourself responded to?!

Subject: Ui Neill Dynasty - Why some O'Neills aren't M222+
Link: http://www.jogg.info/22/ONeill.pdf

Maybe it's time for a re-read for you and everyone else who still thinks
this is a mystery.

Cheers,
Paul


On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 4:20 PM, <> wrote:

> My point is I must have forgotten you pointed out one example months ago.
> I
> spent hours searching the databases and to date have found almost no
> Lamont
> samples period. I was asked if I saw anything to support the Anradan
> connection to the O'Neills. I pointed out that we don't even know what
> the O'Neill
> DNA really is - is it R1b1c7 or should any possible Anradan kindred types
> match the main O'Neill group who are not R1b1c7.
>
> That's the question to be answered. Have you got one?
>
>
> John
>
>
> In a message dated 10/2/2008 3:08:55 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> writes:
>
> Hi John
>
> They are obviously not R1b1c7.
>
> You claimed in an earlier posting that you had never seen Lamont DNA that
> was R1b1c7. You made this claim notwithstanding the fact that I pointed
> out
> Lamont 94014 to you in an e-mail some six months ago. You even
> acknowledged
> receipt of my e-mail by replying to it.
>
>
>
>
>
> **************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial
> challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips
> and
> calculators. (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>

This thread: