DNA-R1B1C7-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Questions ???
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:31:42 EDT

In a message dated 9/29/2008 10:38:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
writes:

John,

Thank you for the explanation. Everything I'd read about the Trinity study
panned out except for the claim about the O'Neil's. That one really had me
confused since my observations told me differently.

Thanks again, Debra



Here's what sparked my own interest in the O'Neill DNA.

"(O’)Gallagher (12), (O’)Boyle (9), (O’)Doherty (5), O’Donnell (4), O’
Connor (3), Cannon
(3), Bradley (2), O’Reilly (2), Flynn (2), (Mc)Kee (2), Campbell (1),
Devlin (1), Donnelly (1), Egan (1), Gormley (1), Hynes (1), McCaul
(1), McGovern (1), McLoughlin (1), McManus (1), McMenamin (1),
Molloy (1), O’Kane (1), O’Rourke (1), and Quinn (1)."


The Trinity spreadsheet had 80 O'Neill samples. Why weren't they listed in
this list of descendants of Nial?


I have to believe the Trinity team is aware of this O'Neill DNA discrepancy.
Yet they haven't said anything about it in any of their articles.

John






**************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial
challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and
calculators. (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)

This thread:

• Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Questions ??? by "Debra Dunbar Nowell" <>

  • Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Questions ??? by

  • Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Questions ??? by
    • Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Questions ??? by Jeff Scism <>
  • Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Questions ??? by