DNA-R1B1C7-L Archives

Archiver > DNA-R1B1C7 > 2008-04 > 1208543678


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Y-STR DNA-FP Panel 5 Palindromic Pack
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:34:38 -0600
References: <2dff56a0804181110j10e0cb6cjc094b545353644ad@mail.gmail.com>


Is there ever explanations from these labs as to how they get DYS464 so
wrong so often?

Ken

----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Ferguson" <>
To: "DNA-R1b1c7" <>
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 12:10 PM
Subject: [DNA-R1B1C7] Y-STR DNA-FP Panel 5 Palindromic Pack


> Results are in for my cousin Ross Ferguson who is R1b1c7. The main
> reason for the test was to get a better handle of DYS464a,b,c,d which
> at 15-15-16-16 appeared out of whack when compared with myself and one
> other cousin. The result for the more accurate test DYS464X confirmed
> our suspicion that DYS464a,b,c,d is in fact 15-16-16-17. The results
> for the pack as whole are:
>
> DYF371X 10c-12t-13c-14c
> DYF385 10-11
> DYF397 11-14-15-15
> DYF399X 20t-25c-28.1t
> DYF401 15-17
> DYF408 188-188-8-15
> DYF411 11-11
> DYS413 21-23
> DYS464X 15c-16c-16g-17c
> DYS724 37-39
> DYS725 31-31-31-32
>
> I know very little about these marker and wonder anyone sees anything
> of note in the results.
> Cheers,
> Colin Ferguson
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: