DNA-R1B1C7-L Archives
Archiver > DNA-R1B1C7 > 2008-03 > 1205707198
From:
Subject: Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] R1b1c7 or not R1b1c7?
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:39:58 EDT
In a message dated 3/16/2008 2:49:58 P.M. Central Standard Time,
writes:
John,
I have a Cannon member who is 11-12 at DYS385 but is modal on the rest of
the 12 markers that he has. He is tested M222+
Your Fleury FXS2J appears to be off at 385b, 449 & 464 which may not be that
bad if we are looking at 2000+ years. Also FTDNA may have other customers
with those STR values that tested M222+
That could be.
This Wilson sample that tested negative for M222 is what planted some doubts
in my mind.
13-25-14-11-12-14-12-12-12-13-14-29-18-9-9-11-11-24-15-19-30-15-16-16-17
As far as I know this is the only such example out there. But surely there
must be more.
John
**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money &
Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
This thread: