DNA-R1B1C7-L Archives

Archiver > DNA-R1B1C7 > 2007-11 > 1195913751


From: "David Wilson" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Markers 38-67
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:15:51 -0800
References: <c80.1acd7d95.347333a1@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <c80.1acd7d95.347333a1@aol.com>


This was already addressed, but I wanted to reinforce the point more
generally.

Markers 38-67 are slow-moving markers, so for a given population the
variance will be less compared to the first 37 markers. It's not just
R1b1c7. In any haplogroup with a relatively compact distribution, two
individuals are likelier to lie closer to one another on the last 30 markers
than in the first 37.

David Wilson



-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 10:45 AM
To:
Subject: [DNA-R1B1C7] Thanks for sparking the dialog.


The long silence was getting a bit to loud .Hey R1B1C7's if you want to
have some fun ? Create a new Y-search user by only plugging in the last 32
Markers of your 67 marker test .Set the limit to a genetic distance of 2
or 3.for comparing To bad but not all R1B1C7's use Y-search. Or simply
eyeball the R1B1C7. Haplogroup they appear to be closer in genetic distance
than other haplogroups when comparing only the last 32 markers, for some
reason.How strange is that?
G Ashley.





************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This thread: