DNA-R1B1C7-L Archives

Archiver > DNA-R1B1C7 > 2007-07 > 1185210715


From: "Paul Conroy" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Why did these languages supersede
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:11:55 -0400
References: <c46.19776a51.33d63741@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <c46.19776a51.33d63741@aol.com>


Gene,

I'm not quite sure what your point is?

But possible candidate DNA from early farmers - who may or may not have
been Indo-European speaking - would be NRY J or J2.

There is very little of that in the British Isles.

Cheers,
Paul

On 7/23/07, < > wrote:
>
> Just remember that Indo-European refers to a language group, not a
> people.
>
> Paul
>
>
> Paul
> keep in mind The only real open issue is, Why did these languages
> supersede
> the earlier languages of Europe (except in Basque territory)? Was this
> supersession accomplished by chariots, agriculture, or trade? In other
> words, why
> did an Indo-European language become more convenient or desirable than a
> native's own? common since tells us the language came with the migrates
> from the
> stem of the source.that dominated.
>
> Gene Ashley
>
>
>
> ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL
> at
> http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>

This thread: