DNA-R1B1C7-L Archives

Archiver > DNA-R1B1C7 > 2007-06 > 1182188218


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA-R1B1C7] Introduction
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:36:58 -0600
References: <BAY109-DAV670A561FB84F73E2B9ADFD5130@phx.gbl>


Who said 9EUBC was SNP tested as H1a?


----- Original Message -----
From: "R. C. Mac Donald" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:28 AM
Subject: [DNA-R1B1C7] Introduction


> Hello, and a big thanks to all those who have made this forum possible.
>
> I'm M222+ with DYS390 =24, so I've found some of the discussions going on
> here particularly interesting, especially concerning the possibility of a
> subclade within R1b1c7 based on the value of 390 (and of other markers
> too, I presume). It appears to my amateur's eyes, though, that some of
> the confusion about precisely what marks one as a descendant of the "Ui
> Neill" kindred -- allele values, SNP test results or both -- and much of
> the unsound speculation that follows from it could be reduced by adopting
> a couple of simple steps.
>
> First, it would be great if someone could construct a table of all R1b1c7s
> excluding the data for those markers known to be fast-mutating. This
> should make it easier to see clusters of surnames that match roughly the
> old Irish genealogies, as we should expect to see if we aren't completely
> wrong about this whole business.
>
> Second, we should urge all the participants to have the SNP test to
> determine whether they are M222+; a simple estimate based on the STR
> numbers just won't do. In my own case, one of my closest matches on
> YSearch (I'm YPVPQ) is 41 out of 47 (with no marker off by more than one,
> for a genetic distance of 6) with a man named Sinor (9EUBC) who is H1a;
> this is closer than my match to most confirmed R1b1c7s. If we hadn't both
> been SNP tested, anyone looking at our numbers might place us in the same
> subclade.
>
> R.C. Mac Donald
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: