DEVON-L Archives

From: "Sue" <>
Subject: [DEV] 1901 Census Concern
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:54:13 -0400

Hello Listers:

Has anyone come across the following situation when using the 1901 Census Decoder? If so, could SKS please shed some light on my conern?

I did a person search for all RATCLIFFE's living in Colne using the following "Age on 31st March 1901" criteria:

10 years +/- 10 years (male and female)
30 years +/- 10 years (male and female)
50 years +/- 10 years (male and female)
70 years +/- 10 years (male and female)

The following is part of the results I got (Please note that I only included a portion of the results below because the rest of the information was not relevant to my conern):
Page ID
Person ID
Given Names
Last Name
PRO Age
Year Born


50995601
21165420
Stanley
RATCLIFFE
1
1900

50995601
21165421
Fredrick
RATCLIFFE
4M
1901

50995602
21165417
Clifford
RATCLIFFE
26
1875

50995602
21165418
Alice
RATCLIFFE
24
1877



The PageID for the children is different from the PageID for the parents. There were no other entries on the PageID for the children. I am assuming these childred belong to Clifford and Alice RATCLIFFE. But I don't understand why the children were not included in the same household.

Kind Regards,
Sue in Sarnia,
Ontario, Canada
Home of Mike Weir - 2003 Masters Champion

Searching for:
SCOTT in Penrith, Cumberland
SCOTT in Nelson/Colne, Lancashire
RATCLIFFE in Nelson/Colne, Lancashire

This thread:

• [DEV] 1901 Census Concern by "Sue" <>

  • Re: [DEV] 1901 Census Concern by "Daniel Morgan" <>