DEVON-L Archives
Archiver > DEVON > 2002-05 > 1021291911
From: "Helen Walker" <>
Subject: RE: Saunders {Sanders]Clovelly
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 13:11:51 +0100
In-Reply-To: <00c401c1fa10$6b38f480$f68efea9@dell>
I would ignore the spelling variation, as I have found several variants in
different sources whilst researching my SANDERS line. The variations SANDERS
SAUNDERS and SANDER all occur fairly commonly. It could also be a spelling
error on the part of the census enumerator, or on the part of the
transcribers if it is the CDROM version, it is not always that accurate. I
also understand that the spelling weren't standardised by that time.
I'm afraid however that I don' recognise them as mine, although they could
be cousins.
Helen Walker (nee Sanders)
______________________________
This thread:
| RE: Saunders {Sanders]Clovelly by "Helen Walker" <> |