BRETHREN-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: [BRE] John H. of mention in the 1798 Annual Meeting
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:01:12 EDT

Oddly enough, Ham was traditionally stated as being the John H by earlier
historians.
Mentioned without source in 1884 in Richard Eddy's UNIVERSALISM IN AMERICA,
volume 1.
H.K. Carroll stated this as well in a 1878 magazine article in SUNDAY
AFTERNOON magazine.

Going back further to 1848 is Dave Bennedict in the "General History of the
Baptist Denomination in America...) claiming it was Ham. He puts these Dunker
universalists in Green River County, Kentucky;
southern Illinois, Missouri, and Iowa. I think Ive seen material from
around this same time (1840s), but Im still working on putting my notes in order.

steven rowe



**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)

This thread:

• [BRE] John H. of mention in the 1798 Annual Meeting by "Wayne Webb" <>
  • Re: [BRE] John H. of mention in the 1798 Annual Meeting by "Dwayne Wrightsman" <>
  • Re: [BRE] John H. of mention in the 1798 Annual Meeting by "Diane Kerchner" <>

  • Re: [BRE] John H. of mention in the 1798 Annual Meeting by

  • Re: [BRE] John H. of mention in the 1798 Annual Meeting by "Wayne Webb" <>
  • Re: [BRE] John H. of mention in the 1798 Annual Meeting by "Wayne Webb" <>
    • Re: [BRE] John H. of mention in the 1798 Annual Meeting by john shafer <>
    • Re: [BRE] John H. of mention in the 1798 Annual Meeting by Merle C Rummel <>
      • Re: [BRE] John H. of mention in the 1798 Annual Meeting by "Mary Ann Rhodes" <>