ARIZARD-L Archives

Archiver > ARIZARD > 2003-05 > 1053529977


From: "Vera Reeves" <>
Subject: [ARIZARD-L] 1920 Dooley Cox
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 10:17:36 -0500
References: <021901c31f31$a4aaee70$6601a8c0@D388LL11> <00ad01c31f36$818e7d80$0b00a8c0@VeraReeves> <02be01c31f54$777954a0$6601a8c0@D388LL11> <006b01c31f96$2630e580$0b00a8c0@VeraReeves> <034701c31fa9$2b9fc190$6601a8c0@D388LL11>


> Baxter Co., Arkansas marriage record:
> Janie Henderson 24 m. D. B. Cox 39 on 9 Oct 1900

> I think that we might deduct that Ruby was pushin' it on her age at the
time
> that she married S. L. Russell?
>
> What do you all think?

I was looking at the 1910 census and using it for a guide for marriages.
If D. B. married Janie in 1900 the first 2 daughters may not be Janie's.
After all Ruby is 13 and Rena 12 and if my math is correct and they got
married in 1900 - 10 years later they wouldn't have had a child over 10.

RIGHT ? ?

> > > > > 15 April 1910 Baxter Co., Arkansas census, Mill Township:
> > > > > COX, Dooley B. head M W 49 widowed GA SC GA
> > > > > #8/8 Ruby daughter F W 13 single AR GA AR
> > > > > Rena daughter F W 12 single AR GA AR
> > > > > Ralph son M W 9 single AR GA AR
> > > > > Ruth daughter F W 7 single AR GA AR
> > > > > Rela daughter F W 5 single AR GA AR
> > > > > Radieth daughter F W 3 single AR GA AR



This thread: