ARIZARD-L Archives
Archiver > ARIZARD > 2002-07 > 1027388282
From: "Vera Reeves" <>
Subject: [ARIZARD-L] Long and Langston
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:45:25 -0600
References: <19a.5add924.2a6dfb61@aol.com> <029101c231e2$676075e0$657b6244@D388LL11>
>Still throws me off about that William Henry Long, born in 1860. The one
>shown with Priscilla in 1880 - forgot the household. Common sense tells me
>that he was a sibling ot Priscilla, but he's sure not listed in the 1860
>Long transcription, is he? Don Ott is probably right, though. Just need
to
>find him in 1870 - but where?
I may have sent this last night or someone else did. OR Henry got deleted
today. What ever it isn't correct as is.
1870 census book for Izard County shows a Henry age 8 between Nathan and
Priscilla. Using the 1860 census for Nathan's age of 9 months and no Henry
I would say anything is possible with the ages here.
Hope this helps.
Bernie,
We have to quite these late night sessions.
I'm truly sorry for any mistakes I made.
Vera
> 1870 Izard Co., Arkansas census:
> BERRY, Robert 59 fmr TN
> Sarah E. 17 ah GA
> Thomas 16 as GA
> George F. 14 as AR (Long)
> LONG, Nathan 14 as AR
> Priscilla 6 AR
> Patty E. 6/12 AR (Berry)
This thread:
| [ARIZARD-L] Long and Langston by "Vera Reeves" <> |