ARIZARD-L Archives

Archiver > ARIZARD > 2001-11 > 1005061122


From: carrie <>
Subject: [ARIZARD-L] Re: HIVELY
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 07:38:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <004b01c166d6$e3ca3940$ef42b118@chnd1.az.home.com>


PLUS: (someone yesterday sent in some links for
"relationship calculators"), and i think, on one
of those sites, i read that its either illegal or
religiously unacceptable to marry a niece. so
you wouldn't think it would be a publicized fact.
WHATEVER..................carrie
just a (probably unnecessary) thought, but i
found it interesting.

>
> Jane? Born in 1844? Wow, now that's a kicker.
>
> If Thomas Hively married the niece of his first
> wife...........then Hively
> would have to have been married to Sarah Jane
> Langston (born circa 1832)
> that was the daughter of Nathan Langston and
> Patty Ware, shown in the scary
> census below:
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com


This thread: