APG-L ArchivesArchiver > APG > 2007-12 > 1196897162
From: Debra Mieszala <>
Subject: Re: [APG] Ethical Membership
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:26:02 -0800 (PST)
The mystery article has made it to my reading wish
list. Censorship makes one want to know what is being
withheld. While any publication has the right to
reject a piece because it does not suit their needs,
the 11th hour removal of this work raises suspicion.
Who will offer a forum to print the mystery work so
the membership can judge whether or not the EC's
actions were valid and fair, or simply unwarranted
micromanagement? Or is the article stuck in limbo,
with one publication holding it but refusing to print?
Publish and let the membership become judge and jury.
The membership has the ability to sort wheat from the
chaff, which is something the EC needs to seriously
consider. Or perhaps they already have.
--- Melinde Sanborn <> wrote:
> If a well respected author
> wrote an article for the
> APGQ and it was pulled after months of work - after
> typesetting -because the
> EC didn't like it, what would you think?
|Re: [APG] Ethical Membership by Debra Mieszala <>|