APG-L Archives

Archiver > APG > 2007-12 > 1196886054


From: "Jake Gehring" <>
Subject: Re: [APG] Ethical Membership
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:20:54 -0700


Elissa, Melinde, et. al.,

I'd like to share a related opinion, though I'm not sure it's directly linked to Melinde's concern.

Speaking for myself, I believe that as the organization has grown (more than doubled in membership in the last ten years), we've missed an opportunity to 'upgrade' communication and transparency too. I see this as much more of a challenge now than when the organization had 800 or 1,000 members.

I think the new APG "Gathering of the Chapters" meeting at NGS is an example of an attempt to catch up. I believe we can do more to help keep communication lines open and keep processes more transparent.

Examples of what I mean might include an APG annual report to members, better use of our Information Officer position for internal communication (via blog, member forum, etc.). I've had a chance to talk about this a little bit with the incoming EC in the last month, and hope to pick the brains of the 2008/9 board as well. Input from others, whether APG members or not, is certainly welcome--feel free to send me an e-mail with your thoughts.

As far as ethics issues are concerned, when formal complaints are received they are routed to our Professional Review Committee which reviews cases according to pretty strict policy guidlines and then makes recommendations to the EC (and the Board in more serious cases) for review.

Jake Gehring
2008-9 APG President


----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

This thread: