APG-L Archives

Archiver > APG > 2003-06 > 1056912619


From: Larry Fermi <>
Subject: Re: [APG] Ancestry.com??
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:50:19 -0400
References: <200306271103.h5RB3Gqi011993@lists2.rootsweb.com><5.1.1.6.0.20030627200856.01f8bbe8@mail.winco.net><001901c33d17$04839420$a52e2644@1pka7> <006101c33d71$dc777180$6401a8c0@VAIO><062701c33e5e$cf740140$210110ac@DICK><000901c33e60$e9e6deb0$d56097d0@connie9siiy4bm>


I had a similar problem. I did a search on a first name, it told me there
were no matches but showed that there were four pages of no matches????

Larry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Connie Bradbury" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 1:07 PM
Subject: [APG] Ancestry.com??


> Is anyone trying to search 1920 & 1930 censuses on Ancestry this AM? When
I
> logged on I was able to look at the first set of the surnames but when I
> tried to look at the rest I got the message to refine my search. Since I
> had only put in a surname I tried given names. Same result.
>
> Entered a different surname (one I know there are dozens of people by that
> name--my husband's line) in both years and got the message there were "no
> records to view matches."
>
> Wonder what's going on with them. I sure don't like the way they have
> changed these sites.
>
> Connie
>
>
> ==== APG Mailing List ====
> The Association of Professional Genealogists
> http://www.apgen.org/publications/apg-l/index.html
>

This thread: