ABERDEEN-L Archives

Archiver > ABERDEEN > 2008-03 > 1204986939


From: Elizabeth Dolan <>
Subject: Re: [ABERDEEN] Re Helen Will
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:35:39 +1000
References: <c63.29336f2e.35016c69@cs.com> <001401c880d7$ab6201b0$0301010a@Andy><c31aa9c00803080356j2a163b79u8575b956ae298aa7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c31aa9c00803080356j2a163b79u8575b956ae298aa7@mail.gmail.com>


Just had to have a look at this family thinking this name is familar.
Well I saw it alright - this family are the neighbours in Nigg of
the brother of my husband's ancestor.
Joseph DAVIDSON and Jessie STEPHEN and family.

Liz Dolan
Manly Qld Aus

Ray Hennessy wrote:
> Hi Kirsteen
>
> This is the family from the 1881 disc.
> You'll note that Helen is shown as "Married" but there
> are no "John GARDENs" on the disc.
>
>
> Residence: New Deer (Village) ED5 page 3
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> James DALGARNOM25 M
> born New Deer, Aberdeen, Scotland
> Rel:Head Occ:Sclater
> Jane DALGARNOM 24 F
> born Peterhead, Aberdeen, Scotland
> Rel:Wife
> James DALGARNO 4 M
> born Peterhead, Aberdeen, Scotland
> Rel:Son
> John Moir DALGARNO10 mM
> born New Deer, Aberdeen, Scotland
> Rel:Son
> Helen GARDEN M 53 F
> born Fraserburgh, Aberdeen, Scotland
> Rel:Mother In Law
>
> Ray
>
> On 08/03/2008, Andy Candlish <> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kirsteen
>>
>>
>> > Hi Ray, No i have not found her death certificate I have looked at all the
>> > Helen's on Scotland's people, and none of them appear to be her
>> > though I could be mistaken and one of them could be her, as her birth does
>> > not appear to have been registered, and the informants on death
>> > certificates did
>> > seems to be notorious for getting the ages of the deceased wrong I may
>> > download a couple later today and see if i can not waste my credits but
>> > get a good
>> > hit at least the first couple of times
>>
>> It looks like Helen was living with her daughter Jane (Jean) and son-in-law
>> James DALGARNO in New Deer, Aberdeenshire in the 1881 census but I couldn't
>> see her in 1891. She is not with Jane and James in Peterhead in 1891. The
>> 1881 census image would tell you whether she was a widow or not.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>
>


This thread: